Filed under
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
I’ve been reading through some traditional evangelicals, hunting for their understanding of embodiment. Along the way, I came across this gem from Andrew Murray: That there is a glorying in Christ Jesus that is accompanied by much confidence in the […]
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
One of my other pet pseudo-academic theories that I occasionally like to argue is that Phillipians--not Ephesians, not Romans--is actually at the core of Paul's
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
Ehrman of revisionist fame, of course. And Colbert of late-night comedy show cynicism fame. Best line? "What's the son of a duck? It's a
Keith E. BuhlerBible
Job 38:1-7: "Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me... Where wast thou when I laid the
Keith E. BuhlerBible
Spending ten hours a week in discussion with high school students presents some universal truths about human nature. One such universal truth is that human beings do not like to
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
JP Moreland isn't afraid to engage in controversy, or even to start one himself. Two years ago, while addressing the plenary session of the Evangelical Theological Society on
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
VIII. Conclusion My initial move was to outline interpretations of two exegetical issues, namely anthropology and justification, pointing out that a fundamental tension exists within exegesis of both issues, namely
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
VII. Romans 4 with Reference to 5-8 In the preceding section I argued that the thematic similarities between Romans 4 and Joseph and Aseneth support my argument that "
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
(Warning: because this is the heart of the argument, a lengthy post follows). VI. The Anthropology of Romans 4 It is perhaps easiest to begin outside of Paul’s writings
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
Romans 4.9-12 In this section of Romans 4, Paul engages either in actual dialogue or in a bit of dialectical rhetoric with an imaginary interlocutor. Moxnes thinks the
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
V. Romans 4 Paul has just finished arguing that a man is only justified by faith, and not by “works of the law.” In Romans 4, Paul turns to Abraham as an example of this. Moo identifies two reasons for […]
Matthew Lee AndersonBible
IV. Romans 3.20-31 Because Paul’s argument in Romans 4 is an extension of what he has already said, it is necessary to set up our analysis of Romans 4 by examining what Paul had just argued. The debate between traditional […]