The Controversial Case Against Adolescence

September 10th, 2007 | 3 min read

Here’s a litmus test: do you think there is anything intrinsic to being 16-years-old that incapacitates one from making important decisions about, say, marriage? If not, then why does nearly every state have laws restricting the age of marriage?

Login to read more

Matthew Lee Anderson

Matthew Lee Anderson is an Associate Professor of Ethics and Theology in Baylor University's Honors College. He has a D.Phil. in Christian Ethics from Oxford University, and is a Perpetual Member of Biola University's Torrey Honors College. In 2005, he founded Mere Orthodoxy.

Topics:

Books

The Controversial Case Against Adolescence

Login to read more

Related Articles

A Mouldering Feast: The Dangers of Victimhood as Identity

Finding Ourselves in Augustine's "City of God"

You Don't Escape to Narnia

Meet the Author C. S. Lewis Loved That You've (Probably) Never Heard Of

Talking with Andrew Wilson About "Remaking the World"

The Neo-Liberal Feminists are Boring

Spinning Toward Autocracy

How to be an Evangelical Influencer (Apparently)

Reading Ratzinger

Gray on Sociology

Schaeffer’s Legacy

CS Lewis on Political Idolatries

Reading the Pan-Africanists: Julius Nyerere (II)

Positivism and Universal Free Markets

Gray and the Deeply Modern Bolsheviks

Reading “Non-Anxious Presence” (II)

Reading the Pan-Africanists: Julian Nyerere (I)

On Mr. Berry and Professor Jennings

Gray on Modernism

To Die on the Right Side

Reading Mark Sayers’s “A Non-Anxious Presence”

Gray on the Two Faces of Liberalism

Reading the Pan-Africanists: Kenneth Kaunda (VI)

You Mostly Shouldn’t Write About People You Hate

Christopher Thompson on New Natural Law