One of the more perplexing questions of Christian theology is how, if at all, man is made righteous by the death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ.  Perhaps more than any other issue, this question reveals the fault lines between the Protestant Reformers and everyone else.

For Calvin, the question lurks behind the issue of how man retains the image of God.  While critiquing Osiander’s view of the issue, he writes:

“Therefore we must take it to be a fact that souls, although the image of God be engraved upon them, are just as much created as angels are.  But creation is not inpouring, but the beginning of essence out of nothing.  Indeed, if the spirit has been given by God, and in departing from the flesh returns to him, we must not forthwith say that it was plucked from his substance.  And Osiander, while carried away with his own delusions, has in this matter entangled himself in an impious error;  he does not recognize the image of God in man apart from essential righteousness, as if God were unable to make us conform to himself by the inestimable power of his Spirit, apart from Christ’s pouring his own substance into us…And when Paul discusses the restoration of the image, it is clear that we should infer from his words that man is made to conform to God, not by an inflowing of substance, but by the grace and power of the Spirit.

Calvin leaves articulating how the Spirit and humans interact to its proper place in the Institutes–Book III, where he deals again with Osiander–which is mildly disappointing given the unclarity surrounding how grace is given.  If not a substance, then what?

For Aquinas,the answer is clear:

“Now the gift of grace exceeds every capacity of nature, since it is none other than a participation of the divine nature, which exceeds every other nature.  It is therefore impossible for any creature to be a cause of grace.  Hence it is just as inevitable that God alone should deify, by communicating a sharing of the divine nature through a participation of likeness, as it is just as impossible that anything save fire alone should ignite.”

I’m going over my head here, but it strikes me that Aquinas’ formulation of grace’s effect on the soul ties the Divine and Human together so closely that the human is nearly negated entirely.  Perhaps Aquinas saw this coming:  his response to the first objection is an explicit defense of the necessity of Christ’s humanity for salvation.

Regardless, Calvin has no such problem.  In the act of salvation, the human remains human and the divine, divine.  Calvin’s reference to creation is, I think, telling:  the new creation is a (re)forming of an essence by an outside agent (who dwells within), rather than an infusion of a substance.  What God has left divided let no man join together.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson

Matthew Lee Anderson is the Founder and Lead Writer of Mere Orthodoxy. He is the author of Earthen Vessels: Why Our Bodies Matter to our Faith and The End of Our Exploring: A Book about Questioning and the Confidence of Faith. Follow him on Twitter or on Facebook.

2 Comments

  1. These sharing services are not insurance. So not only will it soon be cheaper to actually get real insurance through the exchanges, sticking with these instead of insurance will end up with a penalty.

    I have always be wary of these because people treat them like insurance, but there is no legal obligation, which is fine as long as nothing severe happens. But you end up with cancer and $100,000 in medical bills, these sharing services have no obligation to help you with your medical bills.

    Reply

  2. Hi Adam,

    I’m posting as a member and a staffer with Samaritan Ministries.

    You are correct that health care sharing is not insurance. We go to great lengths
    to make this clear to everyone who is thinking about joining. However, the
    Affordable Care Act recognizes health care sharing and it actually exempts
    participants from being penalized (or “taxed”) under the individual mandate.

    It is also a bit of a misconception that a $100,000 need would take us by
    surprise. Samaritan Ministries members have certainly shared much larger needs
    than that on a regular basis. While there is no “legal obligation” or
    guarantee, our members have been sharing in accordance with the guidelines that
    our member-elected board have set for 19 years, now. To date and with
    God’s blessing all of the eligible medical bills that have been submitted have
    been shared.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *