It’s a pleasure and an honor to be joining the fine gentlemen (and, more importantly, my good friends) here at Mere-Orthodoxy. For my inaugural contribution to this fine forum, the plan is for me to share each week from my intensive, readings-based seminar course on the topic of Evangelicalism which I am taking at the Torrey Honor’s Institute .

The topics that I’ll be posting on will likely be as varied as the intriguing figures of historical Evangelical thought whose works I’ll be reading each week. In general, however, I hope to focus my posts on three subjects: 1) the historical development and cultural impact of Evangelical thought, 2) the current state of Evangelicalism, and 3) musings on the misty path that lies ahead for the movement.

Each post will be linked to the writings of one great Evangelical thinker. I’ll do my best to not delve too deeply into the purely historical issues, but I apologize ahead of time if the history gets too thick—a potentially annoying tendency of those like myself who have been trained as a rhapsode of Clio.

Before diving in, however, I feel that it might be wise to briefly set the mental stage for these posts.

When I mention “Evangelicalism,” the term no doubt conjures in the mind of each person some certain set of ideas, images, experiences, and even public figures. Yet, though many would be hard pressed to quickly come up with a good, necessary and sufficient description of what it means to be an Evangelical, chances are these days that many of the mental-correlations that one might have are not winsome.

This is the case especially in the public square and, to tell the truth, increasingly in certain sectors within the Christian church. The word “Evangelical” is usually spoken by serious-faced news anchors in a grave, knowing, and slightly suspicious tone. Ask the man on the street for a definition and you’re likely to get a dirty laundry list of associations: Fundamentalists. Intolerant. TBN. Jerry Falwell. Ned Flanders.

But when those of us who are even within the moment stop for a second to think, can we provide a fully accurate and viable description of what we are about? Evangelicalism–what is it? What is this thing that is often maligned, that has such a dizzying array of divisions, that allegedly tipped the 2004 election in Bush’s favor, that millions of Americans identify themselves with?

B.B. Warfield (one of the authors who I’ll be writing on later in this series) wrote back in 1916:

“There is that good word ‘Evangelical.’ It is certainly moribund, if not already dead. Nobody any longer seems to know what it means.”

If Warfield thought the word “Evangelical” was dead in 1916, our chances seem slim that we could understand it today. Yet somehow, many of us do seem to know what we mean when we use it–but roughly at best.

My goal, then, in this series is to my best to provide mental fodder that can be used to think more deeply into what is means to be an Evangelical today–and what it perhaps will mean tomorrow–by sharing from the Evangelicalism’s past. I throw wide open the door for comment, questions, and (hopefully) criticisms, and call on my fellows here at Mere-Orthodoxy to take my meager offerings and draw the discussion further up and further in.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Posted by Shea Ramquist

9 Comments

  1. Shea, I’m thrilled to begin to read your weekly column on evangelicalism. You’re a great writer – impressive allusion to the Muses – and a bright-eyed student. I want to know myself better through my roots and I’m sure many others relate.

    I’m looking forward to the definition you find for evanglicalism.

    Reply

  2. There seems to be a difference in Mr. Ramquist’s stated goal and Mr. Anderson’s… I wonder if this confusion can be addressed before the full series gets underway? Shea intends to post on the past, present, and future of Evangelicalism (what DOES that word mean?)… Matt appears to want some kind of historical counterpart to the estimable Joe Carter’s “Know your Evangelicals” series, a series that already deals (exclusively) with the present day thinkers. Is there a real discrepancy or am I seeing things?

    Reply

  3. Thanks for asking for clarification, Circular.

    The posts will focus in on historical evangelical figures in a manner similar to Joe Carter’s Know your Evangelical series, giving some basic biographical information.

    However, I hope to expand the assessment potion and use that to ponder the implications of the figure and/or his writings on the state of Evangelicalism today and tomorrow. I may even separate the bio and the analysis into two separate posts, if that will help in clarity.

    The biography will hopefully be helpful to many; the analysis may be only useful to myself. But such seems to be the nature of blogging.

    Reply

  4. Your comments make the intention clearer in my mind. As you say, it does seem that the generic Bio info will be more accessible (read: less controversial) to the blogosphere. I suppose, though, if they are clearly distinguished, the more controversial stuff, and in that sense the more fun stuff, may be a base for some good conversations.
    Even if the conversations were spectacular and stimulating, it still seems best, if you want my opinion, to have some minimum amount of solid Info- content in each post. Easier said than done, maybe, but “what is not intended is not accomplished.” Thanks for your response.

    Reply

  5. “Is there a real discrepancy or am I seeing things?”
    Personally, I think you’re seeing things. : )

    Reply

  6. Shea, I look forward to reading your posts. I’m sure I’ll appreciate the education.

    Reply

  7. excellent blog. Any chance of an RSS feed?

    Reply

  8. Mr. Ramquist,
    The subject that you are writing about is a necessary one. I believe that the most common description of “evangelical” that a typical American could give is “protestant.” If one calls himself by a name, one must know its meaning. I look foward to learning and dialoguing about this subject.

    Reply

  9. Thanks for the compliment, David! We’re working on it. I am afraid to add any html because last time I changed it, we lost all the comments and text. Any suggestions you or anyone has for technical tutorials would be appreciated!

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.