One of the persistent challenges to the ongoing discussion of the Benedict Option is the claim that the BenOp is primarily a retreat from public life and is, therefore, wrong-headed. Though they are presented under separate names, this seems to be the essential critique of both the âJeremiah Optionâ and the âPatrick Optionâ as best I can tell. (In the mean time, can I propose a moratorium on all other â(Name) Optionâ formulations? And if a writer does insist on inventing a new option, can we at least have a bit of fun with it? I saw âBenedict Cumberbatch Optionâ on Twitter and like it enormously. And yes, the title of this post is an Eddie Izzard reference. Incidentally, hopefully the fact that Iâve referenced Benedict Cumberbatch and Eddie Izzard in back-to-back sentences should establish that one can be aware of popular culture and think the BenOp is a move in the right direction.)
In any case, the counsel of many people is that this is not a time for any sort of withdrawal from public life, but rather committing ourselves to a new level of âengagement,â although engagement, very like retreat, is a generally nebulous term in these conversations.
Login to read more
Sign in or create a free account to access Subscriber-only content.
Topics:
