Wallis vs. Brooks: The Debate that Wasn't.

October 31st, 2010 | 4 min read

Capitalism may not have a soul, but working relations between Jim Wallis and Arthur Brooks might have a future.

Login to read more

Matthew Lee Anderson is an Associate Professor of Ethics and Theology in Baylor University's Honors College. He has a D.Phil. in Christian Ethics from Oxford University, and is a Perpetual Member of Biola University's Torrey Honors College. In 2005, he founded Mere Orthodoxy.

Topics:

Economics and Business

Wallis vs. Brooks: The Debate that Wasn't.

Login to read more

Related Articles

Why Pastors Should Get a Family Wage

The Tyranny of Seeing Only Power

The Ends of Work

The World that Money Makes Go Round

The Act of Love That Preserves All Other Acts of Love

Unions are Dead; Long Live Unions

The Great Unmooring

Good Work

Corporations Can’t Love You

A Theology of Money

How to Value Caring Work

Waiting Tables as Soul Craft

What Two Gilded Age Christian Socialists Would Say to Evangelicals Today

The Masculinity Crisis is an Economic Crisis

Resignations and Reunions: Industrialism’s Broken Promises

Finitude for the Faithful

Burnout, According to Solomon

It’s Not the Economy: Big Tech, Anti-Trust, and the Future of Political Liberalism

The Market Made Me Do It: The Scandal of the Evangelical College

Hansel & Gretel Disenchanted: A Response to Eugene McCarraher’s “The Enchantments of Mammon”

Not for Bread Alone: Notes on Good Work

Against Evangelical Minimalism

Economics Turn Homeward

The Case for Donating Your Stimulus Check

Moral Realism, Public Health, and Truth-telling Amid COVID-19