Skip to main content

Rhetoric v. Substance

March 19th, 2010 | 1 min read

By Andrew Walker

Robert Parham from EthicsDaily.com has a proposal for healthcare reform: Get it Passed! Filled with rhetorically charged missives which casts healthcare opponents as bourgeoisie and “individualistic,” Parham, who myopically makes no mention of abortion mandates, reduces the argument between the have’s and the have-not’s. Parham’s article is an exercise in political simplicity (and I do not mean that as a compliment) and ignores the vast complexities involved in this debate. Rhetoric.

Login to read more

Sign in or create a free account to access Subscriber-only content. 

Sign in

Register