Persuasion and Political Disagreement: Behaving After the Election

November 8th, 2012 | 2 min read

I have a few thoughts up over at Q on how Christians should behave in public on issues where there is widespread disagreement--disagreement which in this case has been codified around our elections.

Login to read more

Matthew Lee Anderson

Matthew Lee Anderson is an Associate Professor of Ethics and Theology in Baylor University's Honors College. He has a D.Phil. in Christian Ethics from Oxford University, and is a Perpetual Member of Biola University's Torrey Honors College. In 2005, he founded Mere Orthodoxy.

Topics:

Politics

Persuasion and Political Disagreement: Behaving After the Election

Login to read more

Related Articles

If It Were Me, I'd Try Not Helping the Christian Nationalists

The Fate of Cain

In Response to Sumpter on Ethnicity and Polity

Tradition as a Way of Life: Yoram Hazony’s Winsome Defense

The Danger of Forgetting America’s Anti-Racist History

Hobbits and Empire: Geography and the Life of Nations in Tolkien’s Writings

On Healing: Learning from Separatists

Christians in the Gray Zone: The Strong Gods are Back

The Axis of Evil Turns 20: Reflections on the State of the Union

We the Fallen People: An Interview with Robert McKenzie

Marriage as Moral Orthodoxy

Starfish Stories

Government: Ally or Antagonist?

“Divided We Fall,” with David French

American Solidarity Party: Don’t Throw Away Your Shot

"God and Guns in America," with Dr. Michael Austin

We’re All Legalists Now: Notes on Solzhenitsyn’s Harvard Address

The Church Speaks to the World: On Pope Francis’s Urbi et Orbi Blessing

Common Good Constitutionalism Considered

Integralism with Pater Edmund Waldstein

Communicating the Gospel in a Partisan World

Auschwitz

Come, Desire of Nations, Come: An Advent Reflection

Pro-Blood, Pro-Soil, Pro-Nation, Pro-Christianity

What is a Nation?