What is your vision of heaven?

That was the question over at the Washington Post last week.  And one of the guest voices was that of the elder statesman of traditional evangelicalism: Billy Graham.

What makes Graham’s answer interesting is that he plays within the boundaries of the question. He doesn’t challenge the language of ‘heaven,’ as I might, (after all, he practically invented it), but skillfully articulates what is perhaps the most popular and pervasive notion of the afterlife among traditional evangelicals.

And it’s not all bad.

The language of ‘going home’ and ‘flying away’ has come under scrutiny in recent years, and justifiably so. The most famous critique was that offered by N.T. Wright in Surprised by Hope. And while Wright is right on the resurrection, he overstates the novelty of his position and is a tad uncharitable toward the (largely, though not exclusively) evangelical tradition on the issue of heaven.

As a representative, consider Graham’s take on heaven.

The Bible doesn’t answer all our questions about Heaven – but it does tell us that it will be far more glorious than anything we can imagine. Heaven is like the most perfect and beautiful place we can possibly conceive – only more so. Only in Heaven will we know exactly what Heaven is like. People have speculated for centuries about what Heaven will be like – some realistic, some fanciful (or even perverse).

As a starting point, a healthy bit of aporia about the shape and structure of the new creation seems appropriate. After all, it sometimes seems like the ‘new’ in ‘new creation’ gets lost. Yes, there’s an affirmation of the created order there. But there’s also a judgment, and given that the ‘new creation’ is inaugurated through the death of Jesus, that judgment is pretty severe.

Continuity, meet discontinuity. An affirmation of uncertainty just isn’t a bad place to start.

But the most essential truth about Heaven is this: We will be in God’s presence forever. And because we will be with God, no harm or evil can ever touch us again. One of the most moving descriptions of Heaven in all Scripture is this: “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away” (Revelation 21:4).

This, more than anything, seems to be the evangelical affirmation. Yes, there’s work to be done in terms of articulating a theology of presence (pace the brilliant John Webster lectures). But Dantean-type contemplation of the divine essence at the heart of heavenly activity isn’t exactly problematic on its face. As the Apostle John’s other book reminds us, eternal life consists in the knowledge of God–a fruitful and productive knowledge, but its knowledge that undergirds any other activity.

In Heaven there will be no more fear or worry or stress. We won’t need locks on the doors, or bars on the windows, or sophisticated alarm systems – because everything that causes fear will be eliminated. Evil and Satan and death will be banished forever, and we will no longer be threatened, either by nature or by other people. Conflicts and wars will cease, and all the things that divided us on earth will divide us no more. God’s promise will be fulfilled. In keeping with his promise we are looking forward to “a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness” (2 Peter 3:13).

This is pretty standard language for evangelicals. But notice it proceeds by way of negation: no locks, no bars, no alarm systems, no conflicts, no wars. But there is no negation of the existence of doors, windows, or even houses. If anything these negations presuppose a tacit affirmation of the underlying structure of creation.

Heaven will also be a place of reunion. I am often asked if we will meet our loved ones there who have died in the Lord. I have no doubt that we will! This truth has become even more precious to me since the death of my wife, Ruth, almost three years ago.

This is another common theme within evangelical descriptions of heaven, and notice how social it is. While the knowledge of God is the central aspect of Graham’s depiction of heaven, it is by no means the only aspect of heaven. At bottom, Graham–like many evangelicals–has made a choice to emphasize certain aspects of our heavenly existence, which means leaving other aspects in the backdrop.

The most important truth about Heaven for us today, however, is that God wants us to be there! We cannot win our way into Heaven by our own goodness, because we will never be good enough; God’s standard is perfection. But God sent His only Son, Jesus Christ, into the world to become the final and complete sacrifice for our sins – and when we put our faith and trust in Him, all our sins are erased and Heaven’s door opens before us.

Graham moves from the ‘most essential truth’ about heaven itself to the ‘most important truth’ about heaven for us today. And in both, the God who sent his Son, Jesus, to live and die for us is at the center.  The eschatological reality of heaven grounds all of Graham’s missional activity and energy.

Again, there’s a healthy corrective in NT Wright’s work that is important to keep in mind. But if evangelicalism’s most famous figure’s views on the afterlife are at all representative, then they might be a little better than advertised.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson

Matthew Lee Anderson is the Founder and Lead Writer of Mere Orthodoxy. He is the author of Earthen Vessels: Why Our Bodies Matter to our Faith and The End of Our Exploring: A Book about Questioning and the Confidence of Faith. Follow him on Twitter or on Facebook.

5 Comments

  1. Matt,
    Some remarks regarding your statement “the eschatological reality of heaven grounds all of Graham’s missional activity and energy.”

    The hope of heaven certainly has a biblical place in motivating believers, but time and again Scripture places it in the context of personal persecution, trial and resistance to worldly and fleshly lusts. Scripture doesn’t present heaven as anything approaching the fundamental basis of God-honoring “missional living” and ordinary evangelism. A few examples for your consideration (look up the * ones if you’re pressed for time) :
    Ps. 16 – note “refuge” in v1;
    Stephen’s defense in Acts 7;
    *Titus 2, esp. v2-14;
    Romans 8:22-25 in light of v18
    1 Thess. 4:1-12, which provide the context for the heavenward focus of v13-17
    *1 Peter 1:4-9 – Peter seems to have been a prime target for (and encourager during) persecution, and he speaks often of heavenly hope, but the main reason he preached was to be obedient to the glory of God (Acts 11:17)
    *2 Peter 3:13-14 – this is the clincher. Look what it says: “But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness. SO THEN, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace WITH HIM” (NIV)

    The gorgeous purity of heaven, where we will live in perfect communion with God, should first and foremost motivate us to live lives holy, sanctified, and (dare I say it), SEPARATED from ungodliness. Hardly the basis on which Billy Graham has embraced and multiplied a lifetime of ecumenical evangelism.

    This is long already, but here’s a question for contemplation: Is the gospel properly presented when it is couched as a choice between heaven and hell? Are those two realities choices or are they consequences?

    Reply

  2. TLC,

    That’s a good point (and one that Graham might well agree with, as he’s pretty comfortable talking about the importance of this life, it seems). I had Phillipians in mind, if only because I’m thinking about it a bunch these days and it has a pervasive eschatological orientation, an orientation that seems to ground Paul’s activity in this life–not least of which is his ability to suffer well. In fact, it’s in that book that Paul rejoices just because the Gospel is preached, regardless of the lack of purity of the preachers.

    But on the whole, I suspect that you are probably right. I’ll take a look at those passages you mentioned and think more about this.

    matt

    Reply

  3. Hi Matt,

    I was doing some reading in The Screwtape Letters this morning and came across some apropos material on the hope of heaven in Letter 15. Consider the following diabolic view in paragraph four:
    “[God] does not want men to give the Future their hearts, to place their treasure in it. We do. His ideal is a man who, having worked all day for the good of posterity (if that is his vocation), washes his mind of the whole subject, commits the issue to Heaven, and returns at once to the patience or gratitude demanded by the moment that is passing over him. But we want a man hag-ridden by the Future – [here comes my main thrust]- *haunted by visions of an imminent heaven or hell upon earth – ready to break the Enemy’s commands in the present if by so doing we make him think he can attain the one or avert the other – dependent for his faith on the success or failure of schemes whose end he will not see.*”

    The future hope of heaven and eternally magnificent joy definitely has a place in the motivation of the born-again, but it is a place of support, not of preeminence. After all, we will be there, of that we can be sure (a truth which sadly Lewis still missed). In the midst of an instant-gratification culture,we need to guard against short-circuiting the proper path of sanctification, even as the final gratification remains unimaginably glorious.

    “Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds,because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance. Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything…Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because *when he has stood the test,* he will receive the *crown of life* that God has promised to those who love him.” – James 1:2-4,12

    Tim

    Reply

  4. […] Trevin goes on to cite a theme I’ve sounded before:  ”heaven” functions as theological shorthand for a much more complex set of beliefs about the afterlife that includes the resurrection of the dead, even if it’s not emphasized as much as we all might want. […]

    Reply

  5. William Chelonis July 28, 2017 at 9:13 pm

    No more tears. It means… no more tears of SORROW. We will ALWAYS and FOREVER have tears of happiness and surprise. Tears of sorrow will be no more according to the scriptures. Just remember that in context. That to have NO tears anymore ever… I don’t think so. I think you could still cry to tears of happiness, surprise, joy, etc. But… tears of pain and sorrow and misery and all the rest… no way.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *