transitional justice for Jim Crow

July 20th, 2018 | 1 min read

Decades after the Civil Rights Act and the end of Jim Crow, it’s clear that American attempts to reckon with racial injustices have been insufficient. But what could we have done — or do — differently? Anthony Bradley has a suggestion:

Login to read more

Matthew Loftus

Matthew grew up in a family of 15 children and completed his medical training in Baltimore, Maryland. Since 2015, he and his family have lived in East Africa, where he currently teaches and practices Family Medicine at a mission hospital. His work has appeared in outlets such as The New York Times, The Atlantic, The New Atlantis, and Mere Orthodoxy and his first book is forthcoming from InterVarsity Press. You can learn more about his work and writing at www.matthewandmaggie.org.

Topics:

Ethics

transitional justice for Jim Crow

Login to read more

Related Articles

The Need for Protestant Ethicists: A Response to Carl Trueman

Pro-Natalism After the Fall

Rescuing the Abandoned: On Embryo Adoption

When We Can’t Remember Why Wrong is Wrong

What Can Natural Law Do?

What I Saw at the We Who Wrestle with God Tour

Making MAiD Unthinkable

Small and Afraid and Without Knowledge

Too Large for One Life: On Friction and Sustaining Tradition

Platforms Aren’t the Problem

four theses on immigration

Good Work

A Theology of Money

the liberal order and its haters

Know Thyself: What Medieval Christians Teach Us About Humility

We’ll make that great heart what we want it to be.

The Burden of Parenting: In Praise of Christian Simplicity

exposing the wounds in the Church

“legalizing marijuana won’t solve those disparities”

education and all God’s children

the moral vision of George Bailey

culture is learning to be free

more on teaching professionalism to medical students

Sabbath and soil

stopping adultery with honesty