Skip to main content

Should We Expand the Scope of the Abortion Debate?

May 22nd, 2019 | 11 min read

By Jake Meador

One of the perennial questions amongst pro-lifers concerns the wisdom of expanding the definition of “pro-life” to encompass political issues beyond the question of legalized abortion.

On the one hand, we’ve published several pieces at Mere O over the years that say why this is a bad idea. Matthew Loftus noted that we risk watering down the meaning of the term while Stephen Wolfe argued that often supporters of expanding ‘pro-life’ are confusing political objectives with political policies. Matthew Lee Anderson has made similar arguments in a number of places, most notably at Vox.

Want to keep reading?

Subscribe for free to access this article and all of our archives.

Free.

Jake Meador

Jake Meador is the editor-in-chief of Mere Orthodoxy. His writing has appeared in The Atlantic, Commonweal, First Things, Books & Culture, National Review, Comment, Books & Culture, and Christianity Today. He is a contributing editor with Plough and a contributing writer at the Dispatch. He lives in his hometown of Lincoln, NE with his wife and four children.