Gray and the Deeply Modern Bolsheviks

September 12th, 2022 | 1 min read

The roots of the Soviet system were in the Enlightenment’s most utopian dreams. Lenin never gave up the belief that, after a period of revolutionary terror, the state would be abolished. Trotsky defended the taking and killing of hostages as a necessary stage on the way to a world in which every human being would have the gifts of Michelangelo and Shakespeare. A vast amount of blood was spilt pursuing these sickly dreams.

The result of the attempt to realize the Bolshevik utopia was a totalitarian regime. This was not a deformation of Marx’s original vision. Despite innumerable claims to the contrary, this was the only result it could have had in practice. Marx’s conception of communism presupposes that the chief source of human conflict is the division of society into classes. Once that has ben overcome, state power is unnecessary.

In reality the roots of human conflict are more deeply tangled. Class divisions are only one of the causes of conflict, and rarely the most important. Ethnic and religious differences, the scarcity of natural resources and the collision of rival values are permanent sources of division. Such conflicts cannot be overcome, only moderated. The checks and balances of traditional forms of government are ways of coping with this fact.

The attempt to abolish the state results in unlimited government. Lenin laid the foundations for Stalin’s regime. In turn, Lenin’s dictatorship was inherent in Marx’s ideal of communism. Totalitarianism follows wherever the goal of a world without conflict or power is consistently pursued.

Jake Meador

Jake Meador is the editor-in-chief of Mere Orthodoxy. He is a 2010 graduate of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln where he studied English and History. He lives in Lincoln, NE with his wife Joie, their daughter Davy Joy, and sons Wendell, Austin, and Ambrose. Jake's writing has appeared in The Atlantic, Commonweal, Christianity Today, Fare Forward, the University Bookman, Books & Culture, First Things, National Review, Front Porch Republic, and The Run of Play and he has written or contributed to several books, including "In Search of the Common Good," "What Are Christians For?" (both with InterVarsity Press), "A Protestant Christendom?" (with Davenant Press), and "Telling the Stories Right" (with the Front Porch Republic Press).

Topics:

Books

History

John Gray

Gray and the Deeply Modern Bolsheviks

Related Articles

Meet the Author C. S. Lewis Loved That You've (Probably) Never Heard Of

Talking with Andrew Wilson About "Remaking the World"

The Neo-Liberal Feminists are Boring

Spinning Toward Autocracy

How to be an Evangelical Influencer (Apparently)

Reading Ratzinger

Gray on Sociology

Schaeffer’s Legacy

CS Lewis on Political Idolatries

Reading the Pan-Africanists: Julius Nyerere (II)

Positivism and Universal Free Markets

Reading “Non-Anxious Presence” (II)

Reading the Pan-Africanists: Julian Nyerere (I)

On Mr. Berry and Professor Jennings

Gray on Modernism

To Die on the Right Side

Reading Mark Sayers’s “A Non-Anxious Presence”

Gray on the Two Faces of Liberalism

Reading the Pan-Africanists: Kenneth Kaunda (VI)

You Mostly Shouldn’t Write About People You Hate

Christopher Thompson on New Natural Law

Reading the Pan-Africanists: Kenneth Kaunda IV

Book Recommendation: Aggressively Happy by Joy Marie Clarkson

Dawson on the Other-Worldliness of Christianity