Dissenting Opinion: Feminine Inclusive Pronouns

October 30th, 2007 | 2 min read

***Every now and then, I like to procure dissenting opinions to items I have written from people whom I know have thought a lot about certain issues. I recently wrote a brief reply to the question of whether Christians should feminine inclusive pronouns, concluding that they should not. This is Cate MacDonald's (biography below) response to that post.***

Want to keep reading?

Subscribe for free to access this article and all of our resources.

Matthew Lee Anderson

Matthew Lee Anderson is an Associate Professor of Ethics and Theology in Baylor University's Honors College. He has a D.Phil. in Christian Ethics from Oxford University, and is a Perpetual Member of Biola University's Torrey Honors College. In 2005, he founded Mere Orthodoxy.

Topics:

Gender

Dissenting Opinion: Feminine Inclusive Pronouns

Want to keep reading?

The Masculinity Pyramid

Mythos and Gender

Sexuality After Industrialism

Defining Healthy Masculinity: A Response to Louise Perry

Best of 2024: Scripts for Healthy Masculinity

Scripts for Healthy Masculinity

Let Me Live Again

What Is Beauty For?

Bad Readers and Their Twitter Swarms

Unpacking the Gender Paradigm

'An Introduction to Theological Anthropology,' with Dr. Joshua Farris

Summarizing the PCA Committee Report on Human Sexuality

The Evangelical Gender Crack-Up

A Year of Biblical Womanhood: A(nother) Review

The Christian Post and Sojourners

One more on Challies/Evans-Gate

An Imperfect Beauty

Gender, the home, and how we define "work"

The Incarnation and Male/Female Mutuality

The Future of Feminism

A Midsummer Night's Dance: Love's Beauty and Roles

Gendered Language and Social Change: The Overton Window and Feminine Pronouns

Evangelical Theologizing 2: The Trinity and Gender

Evangelical Theologizing: Russell Moore on Christian Patriarchy