Is it possible for one to know all there is to know about theology by just reading the Bible for themselves? Join Andrew, Alastair, and Derek as they deal with the idea of Biblicism and balance between isolated readings of scripture and implicit faith in church traditions.
Intro + the meaning of biblicism [0:00 – 2:30]
The difference between being “biblical” and being a “biblicist” [2:30 – 6:00]
Differences between biblicism in the popular and academic areas [6:00 – 9:25]
Alastair gives even more examples of biblicism [9:25 – 12:35]
The difference between what someone like Martin Luther did with the Bible and what folks mistakenly do today [12:35 – 15:17]
The arrogance of being anti-historical and the humility of orthodoxy [15:17 – 17:55]
Alastair drops a “bombshell” interpretation of the Bereans in Acts 17 [17:55 – 18:45]
What happens when we disagree with historical interpretations of texts/doctrines [18:45 – 21:50]
How to deduce from the text and evaluate history [21:50 – 27:15]
Why a surface level reading of the text inhibits biblical meaning + Conclusion [27:15 – 34:01]
If you’re interested in supporting the show financially, you can check out our Patreon here.
Finally, as always, follow Derek, Andrew, and Alastair for more tweet-sized brilliance. Thanks to Timothy Motte for his sound editing work. And thanks to The Joy Eternal for lending us their music, which everybody should download out of gratitude for their kindness.