Chesterton and Lewis, Cont.

May 21st, 2008 | 4 min read

While offering his own take on the differences between the respective literary imaginations of C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien, Martin Cothran offered this substantial and skillful critique of my defense of C.S. Lewis:

Login to read more

Matthew Lee Anderson

Matthew Lee Anderson is an Associate Professor of Ethics and Theology in Baylor University's Honors College. He has a D.Phil. in Christian Ethics from Oxford University, and is a Perpetual Member of Biola University's Torrey Honors College. In 2005, he founded Mere Orthodoxy.

Topics:

Literature

Chesterton and Lewis, Cont.

Login to read more

Related Articles

Beware the Great Quote

Heads in the Heavens (or in Hell)

Why Christians Need Horror

The Birth of Comedy

Unreachable Rapture: Rescuing Romance

Free Speech When No One is Listening

Fruit of the Enlightenment

Tolkien's Holy Fools

Detective Fiction and the Fun of Orthodoxy

Twitter Is Like Elizabeth Bennet's Meryton

What I Saw in the Shire--JRR Tolkien and the Love of Little Things

When the Story Stops Telling Itself: A New Letter from C.S. Lewis

A Reading Guide for 2013

Home: An Essay on The Little Way of Ruthie Leming

A distant, glorious echo: Tolkien and typology

Jackson and Tolkien: Hollywood's Infatuation With Angst

Ruminations on Joy

Law and Les Miserables, Revisited

Adults in the Body of Children: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe and Midsummer Night's Dream

Developing an Ecological Orientation Through the Narrative Imagination

"Her eyes drank in the breadth of it": a phenomenology of receiving the land

The same old New World?

The Genius of the Land

Hamlet on Embodiment

C.S. Lewis was True to Himself