March 31, 2005

More Moloch…

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson @ 2:24 pm | Categories: Philosophy, Pro-Life | 2 Comments`

New Mere O friend John Schroeder of Blogotional is worried that I’m spending too much time in the ivory tower. Apparently, he thinks that I’ve spent so much time up there that he needs to point out when he’s making jokes. Sadly, I do not spend nearly as much time in the cold academic tower as John thinks–would that I spent more time there!

He also points out this Taranto piece on the “Roe Effect.” In essence, the “Roe Effect” claims that abortion will actually make the country more conservative, simply because conservative people are having the babies. I am interested in two key stats: (1) Are conservatives having more babies, and (2) do conservative children actually retain (on average) the conservativism of their parents. My hunch is that statistically, those children from conservative parents who attend college do not end conservative. I’m not much of a web researcher, but if anyone has seen numbers on where ages 18-22 fall politically, that might help determine whether Taranto’s thesis has merit.

March 30, 2005

Changes to Mere O

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson @ 4:39 pm | Categories: News | 2 Comments`

You may notice some updates to the side-bar. I have been slowly picking up some html and have become savvy enough to add a few items. The first is the SoCal Alliance blogroll. This came out of a bloggers meet-up that both Keith and I attended. We had a fantastic time together, and I am looking forward to continuing to develop these relationships.

The second highlights that I am now a reviewer for Stacy Harp’s Mind and Media. Stacy distributes books and other items to bloggers, who read them and review them. A review of Seeds of Deception is forthcoming. In the future, I’ll be reviewing some other works as well.

March 29, 2005

Moloch will eat his children…..

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson @ 5:42 pm | Categories: Philosophy, Pro-Life | 2 Comments`

Check out this provocative piece from Meghan Cox Gurdon in NRO, in which she draws a parallel between cannabilism and stem cell research. It’s written in the style of Lewis’ Screwtape Letters, though it lacks the wit.

A snippet:

“I have heard,” Mildew begins, and blushes. “The fact is, Uncle, I have heard things that seem impossible. Is it really true that you have found a way to get them to eat — “

” — their young?” Screwtape interrupts with a hungry smile.”Yes. Yes! I have found the key, the key, my boy, to unlocking the worst in the human heart. Oh, massacres are entertaining enough, and reasonably productive. Rapine and thieving and savagery and the usual nonsense go a good distance to wrecking men’s souls, but not in sufficient numbers. Not for us to win for good — that is, ha-ha, for ill. We must forever be stoking grievances, feeding pride, and constantly thrusting and parrying with the Enemy and his agents. No, the beautifully corrupting key that I have found is vanity.”

“I’ve read about that,” Mildew says, remembering. “In first year college, Know Thine Enemy 101, I think it was. All is vanity, saith the preacher,” the nephew quotes, his mouth twisting as if he has bitten a bad snail.

Screwtape grimaces companionably. “Indeed. Fortunately most of them don’t bother with that any more.”

“But how do — ”

Screwtape presses on. “What does Man want? He wants sex, he wants comfort, he wants to be young. He does not want to be told he can’t have what he wants, or to be inconvenienced, or, worse, to be told his desires are wrong. This is where the Enemy’s agents end up doing our work for us, Mildew, countless times!” Screwtape chortles. “Man is a creature of appetites, Mildew. Remember that.”

“Appetites, yes, but eating their young, Uncle? I feel sure that I read somewhere that humans are naturally revolted by cannibalism. The Enemy’s doing, no doubt, but still, there it is.”

Screwtape fixes his nephew with a shriveling glare. “We are not inducing them to broil the little tykes, dear boy, this is no fricassee of first-graders.” He sighs heavily, a sufferer of fools, but then brightens, clearly distracted by a pleasing thought. “That’s an idea, though. Must get Singer to write something up for me on that…excellent. Now, where — ”

“Not broiling them.”

“Yes. My achievement, the reason for this — ” Screwtape gestures largely about the handsome apartment — “is that I have managed, by appealing to man’s love of self, his vanity, to convince millions that it is not cannibalism, but progress, to turn tiny human infants into medicine. The strong picking the weak apart, cell by cell, to be consumed by the strong? Brilliant!”

It reminded me of The Everlasting Man, by G.K. Chesterton. In the chapter “The War of Gods and Demons,” Chesterton writes:

In the New Town, which the Romans called Carthage, as in the parent cities of Phoenicia, the god who got things done bore the name of Moloch, who was perhaps identical with the other deity whom we know as Baal, the Lord. The Romans did not at first quite know what to call him or what to make of him; they had to go back to the grossest myth of Greek or Roman origins and compare him to Saturn devouring his children. But the worshippers of Moloch were not gross or primitive. They were members of a mature and polished civilisation, abounding in refinements and luxuries; they were probably far more civilised than the Romans. And Moloch was not a myth; or at any rate his meal was not a myth. These highly civilised people really met together to invoke the blessing of heaven on their empire by throwing hundreds of their infants into a large furnace. We can only realise the combination by imagining a number of Manchester merchants with chimney-pot hats and mutton-chop whiskers, going to church every Sunday at eleven o’clock to see a baby roasted alive.

In my favorite Chesterton passage ever, he writes:

It may sound fanciful to say that men we meet at tea-tables or talk to at garden-parties are secretly worshippers of Baal or Moloch. But this sort of commercial mind has its own cosmic vision and it is the vision of Carthage. It has in it the brutal blunder that was the ruin of Carthage. The Punic power fell because there is in this materialism a mad indifference to real thought. By disbelieving in the soul, it comes to disbelieving in the mind. Being too practical to be moral, it denies what every practical soldier calls the moral of an army. It fancies that money will fight when men will no longer fight. So it was with the Punic merchant princes. Their religion was a religion of despair, even when their practical fortunes were hopeful. How could they understand that the Romans could hope even when their fortunes were hopeless? Their religion was a religion of force and fear; how could they understand that men can still despise fear even when they submit to force? Their philosophy of the world had weariness in its very heart; above all they were weary of warfare; how should they understand those who still wage war even when they are weary of it? In a word, how should they understand the mind of Man, who had so long bowed down before mindless things, money and brute force and gods who had the hearts of beasts? They awoke suddenly to the news that the embers they had disdained too much even to tread out were again breaking everywhere into flames; that Hasdrubal was defeated, that Hannibal was outnumbered, that Scipio had carried the war into Spain; that he had carried it into Africa. Before the very gates of the golden city Hannibal fought his last fight for it and lost; and Carthage fell as nothing has fallen since Satan. The name of the New City remains only as a name. There is no stone of it left upon the sand. Another war was indeed waged before the final destruction: but the destruction was final. Only men digging in its deep foundation centuries after found a heap of hundreds of little skeletons, the holy relics of that religion. For Carthage fell because she was faithful to her own philosophy and had followed out to its logical conclusion her own vision of the universe. Moloch had eaten his children.

The hopeful note that the forces of Moloch will destroy themselves is repeated by Lewis in both Screwtape Letters and That Hideous Strength. Chesterton clearly sees the ideology of Carthage (materialism, to pick one) in his own society, yet doesn’t seem to reduce it to simply a war of ideas–rather, it’s a war of gods and demons. This is a theme that I have heard several prominent Christian thinkers repeat recently and it heralds back to Augustine’s City of God. When thinking about our culture, the hope we have is that the forces that are against life will ultimately result in the destruction of their own civilization.

March 27, 2005

In (some) Theaters: “Off the Map”

Posted by Nathan James @ 4:04 pm | Categories: Reviews (Films) | 0 Comments`

This strange film goes slowly along over the contours and expressions of one summer in the life of a nothing-if-not-eccentric family in rural New Mexico. The events of that summer do not drive the movie. In fact, I’m at a loss to say what exactly drives the movie. The characters are heart-felt, the visions given of the New Mexico landscape are subtle and deep but not heavy-handed, it’s unpredictability keeps the relationships fagile and mostly genuine, and the acting might convince you to cry, if you’re a sissy boy. The film is subtle and not sensational.

I say, go see it, unless you’re in the mood for a circus. It’s a sad and moving texture of a story, if you have the patience and attention to sit with it.

And it was considered in Sundance.

“Indeed”

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson @ 10:10 am | Categories: Theology, Theology (Christology) | 0 Comments`
On this day we commemorate the day when the Christ, the Lord of all, vanquished the power of death for all. Death was Satan’s final stronghold, and man’s final obstacle, and it was defeated on that first Easter morn.
Jesus in the Gospel of John states: “For God loved the world in this way, namely, that He gave His only Son.” By giving Himself over to the hands of men, God submitted himself to the unjust and unfair treatment of men. In so doing, he answered those who would claim that because of the evils of this world, God could not exist. He experienced the unjustness they claim is inherent in the world–He experienced Himself the sort of unjustified and senseless suffering that we often stumble over. Yet Christ overcame the power of death and sin–the senseless and cruel evils of this world are not strong enough to overpower the light of the goodness and glory of God, goodness and glory which are manifested in the redemption which Christ completed on Easter morning.
Christ has shown to us the path which we all must travel. Nietsche thought that what didn’t kill him would strengthen him. Christ reveals that strength is available only through the dying and rising again, a process which we celebrate on this happy Easter day.

March 26, 2005

Interesting Reading for the Weekend

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson @ 11:13 pm | Categories: Pro-Life, The Soul, Theology, Theology (Bible) | 0 Comments`

I know it’s Easter today and I have a ton of Easter thoughts. However, as I was perusing the blogs tonight I found some very interesting reading.

For instance, check out Hewitt’s recent work on the Schiavo case (particularly here and here). Hewitt has taken a minority position (among “big time pundits”, at least) and is ably defending it. Althouse’s comments were fairly convincing (see here ht:Instapundit), but Hewitt has made me reconsider.

See also the letter from a Florida lawyer on the discrepancy in the lawyers for each side and how that has affected the Schiavo decisions. Hindrocket at Powerline concurs with the letter-writer that if the fact finding was done at the trial court, then it would be almost impossible for Terri’s parents to appeal on the basis of new arguments or facts–hence the “de novo” dictum from the halls of Congress.

Finally, I respect Donald Sensing’s political work a lot, but I find a lot to disagree with here, including this excerpt from the Abingdon Dictionary of Theology:

The word “soul” has a very different meaning for the biblical writers from the understanding that we usually assign to it. The Hebrew word often translated as “soul” basically means “breath,” and is often used simply to designate “a living being” (not always a human, sometimes an animal). The Hebrew word, along with its New Testament Greek equivalent, can mean “life,” and even “person” or “self.” Both the Hebrew and the Greek words used in the Bible can stand for the unity of personality, since the Jews conceived of human beings as a unity, rather than as a duality of body and soul. In fact, there is no distinctive word for “body” in Hebrew; one is not needed because there is no separate part of a human being, distinct from that person’s “soul,” that needs to be so distinguished.

In the New Testament, Paul uses “body” as a collective noun for the unity of the flesh and soul. He never makes a hard and fast distinction between the two. The biblical view of human being is we are whole persons with no part detachable. We do not have bodies, we are bodies. We are flesh-in-unity-with-soul.

Sensing should check out John Cooper’s excellent Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting, in which he argues that Jewish thought had ample room for some concept of a soul (see Ezekiel, for instance, and the “dry bones”). The categories Cooper employs for humans are “ontological dualism” with a “functional holism,” categories that sound very similar to the “soft dualism” that according to this Pauline scholar is “unavoidable.” Eschewing Platonist interpretations of the soul is fun and easy to do (everyone gets to take a swat at Plato eventually!), but discounting the interpretative and theological work of Augustine (and other Church Fathers) due to their Platonic influences should be done with greater fear and trembling (and solid exegetical work) than is often practiced. Statements like “But both Protestantism generally and Catholicism officially maintain that the death of the body releases the soul to exist independently in its eternal reward” simply mischaracterize the positions of both Protestantism and Catholicism (never mind that there isn’t really an “official” Protestant teaching on, oh, just about anything). For example, prominent Neo-Platonist Augustine (claimed by both Catholics and Calvin) clearly argues in Book XIX and XXII of City of God that a resurrection of the physical body will occur.

It’s late. I’m tired. Happy reading.

Easter Prayer after reading Augustine’s “Confessions”

Posted by Andrew Selby @ 7:14 pm | Categories: Theology, Theology (Christology) | 0 Comments`

Lord, you are good and your promises never fail. I bless you most precious God, maker and sustainer of the universe. I am learning much through Augustine right now. He fell away from you and must return, but can only do so through and because of your wondrous grace. He and I can only return to you, our Home, our eternal and perfect and blessed God, source of all good, by the condescension made by our sweet Lord, Jesus Christ.
He did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but even then let it go to take on human form. Our blessed Lord became a man! And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us. How great and awesome! May praises never cease to ring about this intoxicating truth.
Yet the story of redemption doesn’t end there. He did not only become a man, but lived a perfect life as a man: the life we all should have lived (and that you call us to now with all its blessings and joy in the easy yoke). Our perfect Lord did more than live a perfect life: He was obedient to death, even death on a cross. He endured unspeakable sorrow, rejected by all men, even his closest disciples. He boldly faced rejection by His Father, our Father, who is our source of good, who loves us and cares for us forever and ever. Jesus submitted to the Father’s scorn as all mankind was punished through Him as “justice cut the deepest lash.” (Herbert’s The Sacrifice) He suffered unspeakable agony on the cross, yet counted it joy for what was set before Him.
The joy is that He rose again. Life, sweet life, is now attainable through the Resurrection. He is seated at the right hand of God and sent His Spirit to help us through the rest of our journey.
Good Father, let us learn and reflect more and more upon you as we go. Let blessed Augustine be our example as he took time to be and not to be made up of a collection of doings. Let our lives be characterized by steady reflection and introspection, yielding great fruit as our meditations and disciplines allow us to love our brethren and the world around us. Let our lives look like the life lived (and died) by Jesus. Let us take up our crosses and trust that our loving Father, who loves us as His own sons, would raise us up again.
Praise God! Praise Him from whom all blessings flow! Praise Him all creatures here below! Praise now and always to the righteous, blessed, and glorious Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, in the name of Christ! Amen.

March 24, 2005

Pagan vs. Christian in the Schiavo Case

Posted by Andrew Selby @ 8:08 pm | Categories: Pro-Life | 0 Comments`

One of the issues at the heart of the debate is the battle for the inherent sanctity of life. Americans are now asking themselves: is a life of suffering worth listening? The fact that we are now asking this question reveals the battle between Pagan and Christian ideals: paganism is back.

One of the striking lessons learned from study of Roman history is the frequent suicides Romans committed when their armies had lost in battle or they had been politically ousted. (Good thing for liberals that these ideas haven’t fully taken over the culture!) Those Romans who chose to take their lives in such circumstances basically believed that life without honor was not worth living. Unfortunately, the paganism that threatens the West is a step lower. We say life without pleasure isn’t worth living.

Christianity radically changed this idea. Through the example of our sweet Lord, whose horrendous death on the cross on behalf of mankind we remember tomorrow, we learn that this life can still be lived in a beautiful and fulfilling way despite the presence of pain. The Christian truthfully acknowledges that a life of pain is not the life that we were meant to have, but affirms that the health of the soul is more important than that of the body. This life is a school for our souls in which we learn lessons so that we can more fully enjoy our majestic Three-person God.

One of those lessons might be what Terri Schiavo is experiencing right now. The Christian in that situation bears under the suffering, putting his or her hope in the Resurrection and the life to come. The Pagan ends it all. The Pagan tries to grasp at this life, expecting it to bring ultimate fulfillment. In trying to gain his life, he loses it. The Christian, in losing his life for Jesus’ sake, gains it.

May God bring us a revival of Christian culture and allow us to defeat the ideas of death in the new Paganism.

Incidentally, Lauryn Hill’s song, Zion, is a pro-life anthem worth a listen. She was willing to sacrifice her career, realizing that it couldn’t fully satisfy her, and kept her baby instead of aborting it despite social pressure to do so.

March 21, 2005

Robert George on Terry Schiavo

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson @ 10:44 pm | Categories: Outside Articles of Interest, Pro-Life, Quotations | 0 Comments`

Robert George on Terry Schiavo (ht: Volokh Conspiracy):

I don’t see that any just authority of the state of Florida is being displaced by the effort of Congress to ensure that Terri’s right to life is honored and that civil rights claims on her behalf are given a hearing in the federal courts. By “just authority of the state of Florida,” I mean the authority of the people of Florida to make laws through their elected representatives, subject to the provisions of the state constitution and the Constitution of the United States. I am not impressed by appeals to “federalism” to protect the decisions of state court judges who usurp the authority of democratically constituted state legislative bodies by interpreting statutes beyond recognition or by invalidating state laws or the actions of state officials in the absence of any remotely plausible argument rooted in the text, logic, structure, or historical understanding of the state or federal constitution. The fact is that, under color of law, Michael Schiavo is seeking to deprive Terri of sustenance because of her disability. Under federal civil-rights statutes, this raises a substantial issue. It cannot be waved away by invoking states’ rights.

George is the foremost natural law theorist in America today. The entire interview is a must read.

Terri Schiavo Case – Bush gets involved

Posted by Andrew Selby @ 12:52 pm | Categories: Pro-Life | 14 Comments`

This case is really getting to my heart – I haven’t become this spirited about an issue for quite some time. Michael Schiavo, Mrs. Schiavo’s husband, is allowing her to slowly die since he removed her feeding tube. So far, it’s been three days since she went off the tube. Her parents are desperately trying to save her life. President Bush and both houses of Congress have become involved.

Two issues are of relevance in this case:
1) The precedent of federal intervention in a case like this. Yes, I think it’s generally bad when the federal government intervenes in a case that ought to be decided by the state. But that’s a secodary issue. The primary issue is why courts are deciding values questions such as this. The courts are not elected by the American people (in many cases). Our country, whether liberal elitists like it or not, is a rule of the majority. This case, involving such deep and crucial moral questions as the right to live, should not be a matter that the courts alone decide on. We are a nation ruled by the people and the people must decide on how the Schiavo case turns out. Let our elected officials decide the matter. If Mrs. Schiavo is allowed to die, it sets a dark precedent for our future.

2) The culture of life vs. the culture of death. It’s amazing to me the amount of people who (thoughtlessly and unreflectively) would want to die if put in Mrs. Schiavo’s position. We understand so little what life really is. Cases like this reveal our beliefs, and many (especially the “academics” who make up our courts) seem to think the human person is just a body. When it ceases to function well, why don’t we just kill it? (Notice the impersonal “it.”) Rather, the human person is body and soul. Mrs. Schiavo is alive. Her soul still functions and she may communicate. That is holy and beautiful. We can’t let her adulterous husband put her to death.

Let us pray that Mrs. Schiavo is resurrected as we celebrate the Resurrection that gives us hope…

European Birth Rates

Posted by Matthew Lee Anderson @ 8:30 am | Categories: Christianity and Culture, Pro-Life | 0 Comments`

Donald Sensing at One Hand Clapping links to a few articles detailing the impending crisis in Europe. The Pope coined the term ‘culture of death.’ Europe’s culture of death might just result in the death of cultural Europe. Too much abortion, not enough fertility leads to a widespread takeover by immigrants (in this case primarily Muslim immigrants). A similar pattern is happening in the United States, except we attract Hispanic immigrants. Think there’s another reason Bush has been slow to close the border?

Steven Wright quote for the day

Posted by Keith E. Buhler @ 1:18 am | Categories: Quotations | 0 Comments`

When I was little, my grandfather used to make me stand in a closet for five minutes without moving. He said it was elevator practice.

Steven Wright quote for the day

Posted by Keith E. Buhler @ 1:18 am | Categories: Quotations | 0 Comments`

I went to a restaurant that serves ‘Breakfast At Any Time.’ So I ordered French Toast during the Renaissance.

Next Page »